The Family of Carlos IV hangs in a place of honor in Madrid’s Prado Museum.
At first glance Goya’s painting doesn’t seem exceptional, just a bunch of
self-satisfied people dressed in finery while having their group portrait
painted. But if we look harder we can see what prompted Ernest Hemingway to
call this painting a masterpiece of loathing.
Francisco Goya (1746-1828) held the
position of First Painter to the King of Spain, and was his personal friend. In
fact, the two liked to wrestle when prying eyes weren’t around. But Goya’s
integrity as an artist compelled him to depict the king warts and all. Goya was
an ill-mannered skirt chaser, a relentless social climber, and stone deaf. The
artist also went through periods where a recurring illness rendered him insane.
He couldn’t have been easy to get along with.
Spain’s most complicated artist has always
captured the public’s imagination; we reject the notion of him as a rich
courtier currying favors from nobility; instead we think of him as one of us,
poking and prodding the establishment with his wit and genius. This was the guy
who painted the famous Clothed Maja
(lower class woman of mystery) along with the more famous naked version—the
first female nude ever painted to show pubic hair. The nude version was hidden
from the Inquisition behind a wall that spun around when a cord was
pulled.
Goya was known to seduce married women and
engage in swordfights and duels from time to time, and there were those bouts with
insanity that would eventually set him on the path to artistic exploration
heralding the birth of modern art.
In 1800 Goya was commissioned to paint the
family of King Carlos IV. This was the last time Goya would paint for the
royal family and it’s tempting to think the reason had to do with this
remarkable painting, but not so. No one depicted in the painting ever
registered a complaint. The truth—the royal family was too dimwitted to see
what Goya had done. He’d peeled back the layers on this rotten onion to expose
the stinking center; it’s as if Goya had decided to bury forever the concept of
the divine right of kings. Goya seems to be saying: if this greedy grasping
family has been elevated by God, then surely God doesn’t know what he’s doing.
An art critic once commented that this
didn’t resemble nobility at all, claiming this looked more like the corner
baker and his family dressed up after winning the lottery. An apt description,
even though the man in the brown suit happens to be King of Spain. Showing off his mastery of
brushwork, Goya whips up glorious silks and medals on the monarch’s chest, but
the King’s face, bloated from a lifetime of excess and privilege, is piggish
and stupid.
In this painting as in life, Carlos has
been pushed aside by a legendary shrew, his overbearing wife Queen Maria Luisa
of Parma, so unsightly she often made fun of her own ugliness. But she was proud of her plump arms, which Goya paints as if
about to explode like overripe fruit. The little boy in the red suit is Maria
Luisa’s youngest child, Infante Francisco. Francisco’s face is a dead ringer
for that of Manuel de Godoy, Spain’s Prime Minister and Queen Maria Luisa’s
not-so-secret lover.
On the left side of the composition a
young man in pale blue struggles to conceal the Draco Malfoy sneer of someone
who delighted in torturing small animals. He is Crown Prince Ferdinand who
would one day reign as Ferdinand VII, arguably the worst king ever to sit on
the throne of Spain. He insisted that Goya include his beautiful bride. Notice
how the bride’s head is turned so you can’t make out her features. Why? Because
there was no bride. The crown prince
wasn’t even engaged at the time. He’s portrayed for all eternity standing
beside a faceless woman.
Other interesting details can be found in this masterpiece,
including Goya himself, lurking in the shadows while
creating this very painting. The flashing blue diamond in the Queen’s headpiece is probably
the diamond that disappeared from Versailles during the French Revolution—now in the
Smithsonian and known as the Hope Diamond.
It’s said that when The Family of
Carlos IV was finished, a friend of the
artist saw the canvas and was so horrified at this depiction of the royal
family that he feared Goya would be thrown in prison. Fortunately for us, the
painting was never altered.
Goya had originally supported Napoleon,
but disillusionment with the French emperor prompted him to turn his back on
public life as he grew older. Instead, he channeled his tormented subconscious
and created some of the most powerful art ever conceived. To this day, many of
us still see Spain, the horrors of war, superstition and witchcraft through his
eyes.
At the end of Goya’s life his country was controlled by the tyrant Ferdinand VII, depicted by Goya as a foul-faced boy
years earlier. Goya had not supported Ferdinand’s rise to power, and was
surprised when the new king confronted him with, “The only reason we don’t hang
you is because we admire you so much.”
As it turned out, admiring Goya was the
only thing Ferdinand VII ever did right.
Wow- I learned so much reading this! As interesting and informative as these are, you could write a textbook on art history that would be better than those already published-
ReplyDeleteIs there a movie about Goya? It seems like there should be. He sounds like a fascinating character.
ReplyDeletean interesting picture, but i was amazed at your level of knowledge
ReplyDeleteGreat post
What a great post Stephen.
ReplyDeleteWell I thought it was just an ugly family, but since you shared some great insights then I can see the power of this painting. Thanks for the excellent history lesson.
ReplyDeleteHave a terrific day and weekend. :)
Thanks for recounting this story. Goya was more interesting than I thought.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this post Stephen -- it's very interesting -- I knew a little about Goya, but this history lesson is fascinating.
ReplyDeleteABSOLUTELY FASCINATING--thanks, Stephen!!
ReplyDeleteI have loved this pointing (and Goya) since the first time I learned about it in art school. I couldn't believe the royal family could be so ignorant as to not realize the portrait was not complimentary. It really is one of my favorites and your post is wonderful. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteGreat post indeed, but is it just me was everyone so ugly back then?!!?
ReplyDeleteGoogle La Maja Desnuda.
DeleteNot EVERYone was ugly.
If women were painted sans pubic hair, then I guess it wasn't because they had visited Brazil. Was real hair considered crude?
ReplyDeleteLove,
Janie
Superb post! Thanks for the extraordinary insight and analysis.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting. I always learn new things when you do posts about art. What was the deal with the Crown Prince insisting on a wife being painted when there wasn't one? Was he delusional? There are some seriously unattractive people in that painting. I would have hidden it in a closet if I were Queen Maria.
ReplyDeleteNo mention of the dude behind King Carlos? He looks like he is ready to stab His Royal Highness in the back!
ReplyDeleteSr. Wendy Beckett talked about this painting, too; it still amazes me that Goya got away with this.
ReplyDeleteOnce again a very interesting behind the scenes description of a painter and some of his paintings.
ReplyDeletesince they didn't have cameras , the artist was everything and in this case had control over what was thought of these people.
Paintings say so much more than photos can, and it sounds like this spoke volumes...
ReplyDeleteVery interesting!! I love hearing all the behind the scenes facts about things like this. Now it makes me chuckle. The first thing I noticed was the lady with her head turned away. How odd, I thought. Makes sense now! :)
ReplyDeleteThis was quite informative and entertaining at the same time. Didn't realize how much story there is behind all those paintings.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting information here Stephen, Thank You for sharing.
ReplyDeleteThis was a fascinating post. I think you know how much of a sucker I am for History.
ReplyDeleteI also Googled The Naked Maya.
Hubba hubba.
And I thank you for that.
That was so interesting. I love these arty posts. There was an arts programme on here in Britain not long ago, looking at paintings of different eras and how they represented royalty, and the punishments for doing so negatively! Goya got away with this one, then! The presenter was saying how control over the royal image has been lost now that we have the digital age - it was such a fascinating programme.
ReplyDeleteI love your back stories to the paintings. I'm learning such a lot by reading your posts. Thanks Stephen!
ReplyDeleteThat was a great explanation of the piece! I'm not much for art, but I do love history and this was fascinating!
ReplyDeleteIt is reaaly masterpiece
ReplyDeletefascinating history of a skillfully done but certainly not flattering portrait.
ReplyDelete